Another example. Statement favorite. Oh my novel

Writers - people vulnerable, sensitive and touchy. Saints among us, the saints are engaged in other activities. And because it is clear that any writer ge lighting (whatever he may say to you) nice to see that it is written well, and hurt when his work publicly ge lighting ablayvayuts. ge lighting More painful, probably, if silent about it. Even harder - when hush of disgusting feeling creative envy. All this is quite well-known truth.
Bring to understanding one anecdotal example. Leonid Golubovic put on one band "Lima" two book reviews V.Shnipa series "Golden Pen". One, "top" - is commendable-captured, the second, basement, always harsh Joan Cole - peddling-mocking. Involuntarily the question arises - where the truth? Middle? Then needed a third material. Or one of the authors lied, then he - a criminal before Shnip and domestic literature. After all, if the truth about the work in the nature does not exist, you can close all editions and hang locks on typography. They then meaningless.
Yet the truth about the work there. And the task of the critic - her approach. This is not about emotion ratings - good, bad, brilliant, mediocre - but the essence of things, which critics have to see if he wants to call themselves such. We are not interested in his erudition, knowledge as such. They are one tool for finding the truth. ge lighting
Another example. Statement favorite. Oh my novel "Puppets and puppeteers," a review of which appeared in the "Lima" on May 9. I know of only Tikhon Chernyakevich publications on good hit. Now I owe him. Explain why. The structure of the novel is very complicated, meandering. ge lighting I certainly do not risk to be understood or be critical attacks, and somewhat fair. I counted on 50% of the readers understanding of the second half let perceives, I thought, a novel once associatively linked novellas. But in five years, ge lighting while the full version of the novel made its way into print, I came to the conclusion that the core idea is well understood, if 20% of readers. And all of these "quick-witted", which I was tormented by his manuscript for the experiment, were men. None of the experimental women not guessed my riddle, except ge lighting the editor "Fiction" Pauline Hrinchenko. Management of the department of prose even longed to remove the "side" in the chapter, as unnecessary, disturbing the main line. Literally had to fight to protect them. Intuition tells me that there is a critic who ukaraulish main idea of the novel, find the code in the form of "scar over his left eyebrow," ge lighting I hid in the description of the exterior of the four supposedly different characters.
Tikhon Chernyakevich, due to the complexity of the problem, which he brilliantly decided - no doubt a talented critic, whom we count on one hand can be counted. Further, he could find fault "Puppets" last words, and would still be the most expensive for me man.
Cost is not a critical article in the narcissism of the author and kazyranni ge lighting their experiences, not in the presentation of the plot - and vlavlenni and highlight ge lighting the main, essential, peculiar things in themselves. Talent criticism, especially genius - a thing much less than the genius of art. I only know of one critic genius - Belinsky, and this for centuries of Russian and Belarusian literature.
Everyone remembers ge lighting ekstremalka Denisova-Yakovenko that became famous for its vicious glory Herostratian articles, surveys holdyngavskih magazines. Lada Oleinik in this regard is more tolerant, and therefore kept overviews long. She's just not an evil man, although there had been among the authors ge lighting of their pets and "enemies of the people." Now we see Joan Cole. Also ekstremalka with black sunglasses on his spiritual guise. It's a bit improved version ge lighting of Denisova, for which was the most talented ge lighting poet - Ragneda Malakhovskii (!). Such contempt and hatred for authors - from youth (and education, of course), even if you can not see the edge of his life, and therefore do not feel works for people living souls. And some can, and hold on to white light selection of his poems in which "Neman".
Here's a third option. And I and another review ... Brother here is the power of criticism: Who perakrytykue. The only correct view - that is death to all ... Good luck! Arrows and crosses Shnip, VA Boom love, love cross: poetry and prose / Victor Shnip; subject. V. Gnilomedova. - M.: Mast. lit., 2008. - 270. Aired another book by Shnip - "Boom love, love the cross." Started to cause constant formal reviews by critics and ignored ge lighting by the majority to stay Belarusian poetry lovers. ge lighting A. Pismenkov, L. Dranko-Maisyuk, Nyaklyaeu ... List of popular poets of modern Belarus can continue, but it will not Shnip V.. This conclusion is, in truth, I do from personal experience: never met - nor youth, nor among the older generation, nor among philologists, nor among amateur - amateur (what to say, at least more or less regular readers!) His creativity. Only criticism, as if forced to, take note. And last year, B. Shnip also received the award. That award me a little surprised and amused at all .... Or ...